Working one-to-one with writers
Many of the writers who come to this work are at a specific, high-stakes moment: the manuscript is close, the submission window is approaching, and the decisions feel more consequential than any they've faced before.
​
That's exactly the kind of moment this work is designed for.
​
Preparing to query is not just a practical task. It's a moment of reckoning with the work itself — with what it actually is, as opposed to what you hoped it would be. The query letter won't fix a structural problem. The synopsis will expose one. And no amount of redrafting will resolve the deeper question of whether the manuscript is doing what you think it's doing.
That's where this work begins.
​
Most difficulties at this stage aren't caused by a lack of skill or commitment. They come from a misreading of what the work is actually asking for — from intentions that have drifted from the underlying logic of the manuscript, or from problems that have been written around rather than through.
​
My role is to make those things visible: to read the work closely, identify where its logic and its ambitions diverge, and help you understand what it genuinely demands — not just what you want from it.
This isn't encouragement or momentum. It's precise, diagnostic work focused on structure and consequence.
​
​
The two forms this can take
​
Coaching is for writers who want focused support to think clearly about their project, a specific decision, or a block. These aren't neutral conversations. My role is diagnostic and, where it's useful, direct — if there's a clearer or more workable way to proceed, I'll say so. Agency stays with you, but I won't withhold perspective for the sake of process.
Coaching can be a single bounded session around a specific problem, or ongoing work supporting a defined phase — including the final push toward submission. Scope and expectations are agreed in advance.
​
Editorial work involves close reading of a manuscript or proposal, either as a manuscript assessment or a developmental edit. The focus is on structure, narrative logic, and consequence: what the work is doing, where its intentions and effects diverge, and what kind of work the manuscript actually wants to be. This isn't line-editing or proofreading — it's written diagnosis, aimed at giving you clarity about what the manuscript needs before you submit it.
​
Who this tends to suit
​
Writers who are willing to question their own explanations for why the work is difficult. Who can tolerate uncertainty without rushing to resolve it. Who want to understand what the work demands, not just have their current approach confirmed.
​
It's probably not the right fit if you're primarily looking for validation that the manuscript is ready, or for techniques to increase output without changing direction.
​
How to get in touch
​
Initial contact starts with a short conversation — not a consultation, and no assessment is given. Its purpose is simply to establish whether working together makes sense for where you are and what you're trying to do.
​
Not all enquiries proceed to work together. In some cases, the manuscript isn't yet at a stage where this kind of intervention is useful. In others, what's being sought isn't something I can offer responsibly. That selectivity protects the work on both sides.
​
​
​
Contact me directly to enquire about one-to-one work, using the button above.
​
Not ready yet, or unsure about timing?
​
If you're in the earlier stages — still drafting, still finding the shape of the thing — this level of engagement may not be what you need right now.
​
If you're looking for something more immediate or self-directed — a focused review of your query letter or synopsis, or craft resources you can work through at your own pace — you can find those here.
​
​
​
You can join the list below to hear about availability when new spaces open, and to be notified of other ways to engage with the work as they become available. No regular emails — just occasional updates when something relevant changes.
​​